Croatia and Morocco have to recover from their crushing disappointment this week in time to do battle for the quickly-forgotten honour of being the third-place finisher at the World Cup. England have lost a couple of these gatherings before, and I vaguely recall Holland taking a sort-of-bronze in 2014. The outcome of any other semi-final losers meeting was a mystery before looking them up just now.
I was perfectly content living in such ignorance. Why devote precious memory space to a match on the world stage that holds less significance than the Community Shield? Especially at this World Cup, a competition shoehorned into the middle of a club season because, FIFA.
Many players and managers care not one bit for it. “I think this match should never be played,” said Louis van Gaal about his final game in charge of Netherlands in 2014, his second of a three-part series of final games for King Louis. “The honest thing is it’s not a game any team wants to play in,” admitted Gareth Southgate when he was asked about England’s unwanted assignment at the last tournament. Managers can recognise that their players are shattered – physically and mentally – and just want to come home, which is hardly unreasonable. The same goes for the coaches.
The reward is certainly not worth the risk of making weary players lace up one more time while their clubs wait anxiously. So, on Saturday, they probably won’t. Zlatko Dalic and Walid Regragui will almost certainly rotate their squads and the 2022 World Cup finals will offer up Croatia against Morocco for the second time in a few weeks, the only difference from that 0-0 draw being that this will be a rematch of the reserves.
Perhaps Morocco have more than most to play for in this second-last game in Qatar. The Atlas Lions have set a new benchmark for African nations and third does sound one better than fourth. But in years to come, their legacy would not be altered in any way should they lose a match Regragui has labelled “the worst game to play”.
“Yes, we are thinking about our FIFA ranking but it is quite difficult for us and also for you I guess as journalists because it is not really an important game is it, honestly speaking?”
The apathy and general disinterest in a game to decide who finishes third has been rife for years. The European Championships canned the play-off in 1980 and not once has anyone missed it.
The idea is in direct contrast to the principle of a knockout tournament. The importance at a World Cup is supposed to increase with each game. From the last-16, it’s winner stays on. As Van Gaal noted: “In a tournament, you shouldn’t have players play a match for third or fourth place. There’s only one award that counts, and that’s being world champion.”
When, unlike at the Olympics, there is no merit in third place, what justifiable reason is there for continuing with such a meaningless affair?
Ad
